News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google says employees flouting vaccination rules will eve... by Karsteski on Wednesday December 15, 2021 @10:09AM (#29566958)
Should companies also require their employees not be overweight because they are less likely to miss work due to illness?
Re:Google says employees flouting vaccination rules will eve... by chrisseaton on Wednesday December 15, 2021 @10:13AM (#29567012)
I don't think weight is a protected category, so yes this is fine. For example insurers will discriminate based on weight. The military discriminates based on weight. Hooters discriminates based on weight. Etc.
Re:Google says employees flouting vaccination rules will eve... by Karsteski on Wednesday December 15, 2021 @10:29AM (#29567213)
Well I hope we don't end up in such a world. Even if I personally won't be affected negatively. Sounds incredibly distopian.
Re:Google says employees flouting vaccination rules will eve... by xboxnolifes on Wednesday December 15, 2021 @11:57AM (#29568525)
You already do. Just because nobody writes an articles talking about how they try to avoid hiring overweight people doesn't mean it doesn't happen.
Re:Google says employees flouting vaccination rules will eve... by Ekaros on Wednesday December 15, 2021 @10:13AM (#29567014)
Or to be sterilised so they can't get pregnant or make their partner pregnant. Having kids leads to missing work after all.
Re:Google says employees flouting vaccination rules will eve... by shadowgovt on Wednesday December 15, 2021 @03:49PM (#29571446)
An employment policy interfering with employee pregnancy, in particular, is illegal (but only because it was explicitly made so in 1978 - https://www.eeoc.gov/statutes/pregnancy-discrimination-act-1...).

In general, when an employment discrimination is not specifically forbidden via the Civil Rights Act (or interpreted as equivalent to something explicitly forbidden by the Court), it is legal to discriminate based on it in the United States. Beyond that, the Court and the legislature are (from a political philosophy standpoint) generally willing to let individual employees and employers (or employers and unions) hash out the messy details.