Re:“We removed the RSS feed since this technology became obs...
by eloeffler on Monday December 13, 2021 @11:27AM
(#29541068)
Yes, it totally makes sense.
I hold no grudge against news sites or anyone who chooses to publish teasers either. And be it only because they need statistics on which articles are more or less popular. Or ad revenue...
Unfortunately the negative effect for my end remains. Sometimes there is no ideal solution for everyone, I guess.
Re:“We removed the RSS feed since this technology became obs...
by DamnInteresting on Monday December 13, 2021 @11:52AM
(#29541340)
Indeed. As is too often the case, a few bad actors ruin an otherwise elegant solution.
Re:“We removed the RSS feed since this technology became obs...
by fartcannon on Monday December 13, 2021 @11:27AM
(#29541067)
HN is not the place to fanboy over things, but your stories never fail to surprise me. Thanks for continuing on and making the podcast, too.
Re:“We removed the RSS feed since this technology became obs...
by DamnInteresting on Monday December 13, 2021 @11:54AM
(#29541368)
On this day a fartcannon made me feel appreciated. Thanks!
Edit: I hope this didn't come off as flippant; it is refreshing to receive encouraging words without the all-too-common "but I don't like how you do such-and-such".
Re:“We removed the RSS feed since this technology became obs...
by fartcannon on Monday December 13, 2021 @02:16PM
(#29543204)
Not at all flippant! As for 'constructive' compliments, I think the old information superhighway analogy of the internet is applicable because there sure is a lot of roadrage on the net.
Sure, it is always possible for a human to copy and paste my articles' text to their CMS, or for someone to write a simple scraper to extract the desired content. But both of those solutions introduce various hassles, and they require a human to fully accept that they are stealing content, which much fewer people are willing to do.