News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Putty maintainer on his attitude towards security and open source. Parent comment

Re:Putty maintainer on his attitude towards security and ope... by collaborative on Sunday December 12, 2021 @03:13PM (#29533151)
A similar thing happened to me. But instead of tweaking PuTTy I tweaked Poderosa v4 which also has a permissive license
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Putty maintainer on his attitude towards security and ope... by exikyut on Sunday December 12, 2021 @08:10PM (#29535468)
Had*

There was some sort of v4 -> v5 open-source -> commercial switch.

Commercial version: http://www.poderosa-terminal.com/

OSS version homepage: http://poderosa.sourceforge.net/

Source (last change in 2019): https://github.com/poderosaproject/poderosa

Releases (last release also 2019): https://sourceforge.net/projects/poderosa/files/releases/4.4... (also on GitHub too, switch to the "tags" tab)

Seems to be .NET based, and relatively simple in terms of available functionality and featureset.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Putty maintainer on his attitude towards security and ope... by collaborative on Tuesday December 14, 2021 @11:47AM (#29553742)
Thx
[ Parent | on HN ]