Re:California is the only state to hide its spending – nearl...
by all2well on Sunday December 12, 2021 @02:40PM
(#29532879)
Are you not arguing that public sector employees in San Francisco should get a pay cut?
Re:California is the only state to hide its spending – nearl...
by rkk3 on Sunday December 12, 2021 @07:46PM
(#29535330)
Not really, all I did was question the OP scoffing that an 150k salary is not a lot of money. My mother is a public school teacher.
Re:California is the only state to hide its spending – nearl...
by kesselvon on Monday December 13, 2021 @09:56AM
(#29540107)
It's not a lot of money in San Francisco, where you're fighting with every tech company employee for housing
Re:California is the only state to hide its spending – nearl...
by rkk3 on Monday December 13, 2021 @01:26PM
(#29542600)
Do you have a quantitive way of making the distinction of what "a lot" is? 150k is substantially more than the average SF household, and is about 83 percentile for individuals.
Re:California is the only state to hide its spending – nearl...
by bobthepanda on Wednesday December 15, 2021 @09:55PM
(#29574286)
Average home prices in SF is 1.3M, so a household of two teachers would give them a P/E ratio of 5. The P/E ratio for the average US home is 4.4.
Are teachers overpaid, or are people in SF underpaid relative to the value of a house?
Don't equate that with arguing for Austerity.
https://www.openthebooks.com/forbes-why-san-francisco-is-in-... [1] https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/sanfranciscocitycalifornia [2]