Re:Code to flood Kellogg with bogus job applications after s...
by gruez on Friday December 10, 2021 @12:03PM
(#29512245)
>I can follow the code just fine.
Right, I can follow the code just fine too, but OP's claim was
>well written, rather pretty code
Like you mentioned, the file is only 200 lines, so you can get away with quite a bit and still be understandable/maintainable, but that doesn't mean they're all "well written" or "rather pretty".
> 1. undescriptive variable names (eg. data2)
Doesn't matter. The file is 200 lines of code.
> 2. inconsistent formatting
That didn't make the code harder to read/follow.
> 3. copy pasted fragments everywhere
Meh. Really, I've seen code where everything that could be repeated was encapsulated in a function/method/class which was being used only once.