Given the number of changes coming in every release, more twilight zone experiences increases the number of eyes on the discrepancy.
I am confident in the sanctity of the git-sourced code, thanks to there being multiple version of the same repository around that people are actively working on. I am more worried about all the stuff I might rely on that is not git-sourced.
Suppose a tree well known for rebasing frequently is rebased on kernel.org, and the dev doing it works from the k.org servers (might be possible, since they give shell access).
Then downstream would just see it as yet another rebase, no?
I cannot speak for what they really do over at kernel.org, but if they do rebase their public repositories often (which will break people doing pushes and fetch/merges without some regular communication), yes, it is possible to sneak something in because the public rebase will not be as exceptional.
This is where you tell me that's what they do there and make me scared again. ;)