Re:Why the Linux kernel is hardly at risk
by mstroeck on Thursday September 01, 2011 @03:42AM
(#2949023)
No - Linus' machine is still just another node. Git is fully distributed. Everything in that article still holds.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why the Linux kernel is hardly at risk
by ori_b on Thursday September 01, 2011 @09:31AM
(#2949937)
Linus, however, is not distributed. If a malicious commit was discreetly slipped into his repository as a seemingly Linus-sourced change, there is enough trust in him that the change would likely propagate.
Re:Why the Linux kernel is hardly at risk
by exDM69 on Thursday September 01, 2011 @12:38PM
(#2950692)
Not without going through a quite extensive review process and then finally getting signed off (with a crypto signature) by several people.
It's not entirely impossible but there are far more easier ways of getting malware out there.
Re:Why the Linux kernel is hardly at risk
by gnosis on Thursday September 01, 2011 @04:01PM
(#2951517)
The ultimate goal might not be to simply get malware out there per se, but to discredit Linux's reputation as a secure OS.
If that is the case, going to extra trouble to infect Linux kernel source may well be worth it for the attackers.