Re:Ubisoft’s first NFT plans make no sense
by AnIdiotOnTheNet on Wednesday December 08, 2021 @01:18PM
(#29488315)
How does it being decentralized make it unattractive for money laundering?
Re:Ubisoft’s first NFT plans make no sense
by meheleventyone on Wednesday December 08, 2021 @01:27PM
(#29488440)
It doesn’t. Crypto is famously massively popular for money laundering. It just makes it not Ubisoft’s problem in the same way Valve farmed out the risk and responsibility to third party skin sites. Similarly Second Life dealt with this more ethically by engaging a partner to deal with the regulatory side of things
It’s also not a claim I made so I’m not sure why you addressed that question to me.
Re:Ubisoft’s first NFT plans make no sense
by AnIdiotOnTheNet on Wednesday December 08, 2021 @01:41PM
(#29488614)
I addressed the question to you because I thought that was what you were saying: that somehow the involvement of a decentralized ledger made money laundering less attractive. Your description of the actual reasoning, that it shifts the burden of responsibility, makes a lot more sense.
Re:Ubisoft’s first NFT plans make no sense
by meheleventyone on Wednesday December 08, 2021 @01:57PM
(#29488804)
In which case I apologise for not being clearer the first time.
Note I’m not saying this is a good thing and I think all the entities involved should have the same regulatory responsibility but you can see the greasy cogs whirring in some executives brain.