Re:Debunking Cloudflare’s recent performance tests
by dmurray on Tuesday December 07, 2021 @06:21AM
(#29471289)
Among other places, in the United States. The CFAA [0] prohibits "access[ing] a computer without authorization or exceed[ing] authorized access". It's interpreted extremely broadly by the courts.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_Fraud_and_Abuse_Act
Re:Debunking Cloudflare’s recent performance tests
by kingcharles on Tuesday December 07, 2021 @09:39AM
(#29472878)
Here in Illinois they have a specific law which makes violating ToS a criminal offense punishable by up to 5 years in prison.
https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/fulltext.asp?DocName=0...
Re:Debunking Cloudflare’s recent performance tests
by goodpoint on Tuesday December 07, 2021 @02:44PM
(#29477283)
This means I could set up watchcutecatpictures.org with some fine print that prohibits watching more than 10 cats a day and call the cops on random people.
What legal reasoning exists to give companies this kind of unchecked power?
Re:Debunking Cloudflare’s recent performance tests
by kingcharles on Tuesday December 07, 2021 @06:31PM
(#29479534)
Just to make certain put a button that says "I agree" next to a link to the T+Cs.
>According to the court, DeJohn's claim that he did not read those terms was >irrelevant because, absent fraud (which was not alleged), "failure to read a >contract is not a get out of jail free card."
https://www.wilmerhale.com/en/insights/publications/click-wr...
Sorry, what? Where? How's that even possible?