If you follow housing policy you might find wealthy benefactors

>Rent goes up because of supply and demand.

And if people now earn more money they can pay more money to rent a house they want. This would force the people that are already renting there to also pay more, which they can afford because they now earn more money too.

It seems feasible to me that landlords could eat up most of that wage increase.

Exactly. Actually fairly self-evident when you think about it. Rent doesn’t go up because costs go up, it goes up because people’s ability to pay does.

Consider how widely available high-speed broadband through Starlink might change some of these things once that makes living in the interior of the country more desirable. I think we may end up seeing a sort of reverse of the industrial revolution's migration pattern over the coming decades.

Totally possible! I hope we actually see small walkable enclaves throughout the country. Like the little mountain resort towns, but kept afloat by residents rather than tourism. Jobs are a big part of the equation with living in a city, but definitely not the only one. Food, arts, other cultural artifacts that people who live in cities care about are harder to move across the web for sure.

If you assume that minimum waged employees would spend 100% of their raise on rent then landlords would swallow the surplus but more likely the workers would spread it around. They do have other costs.

I havent seen a study that connects the two. A quick google suggests a fair number of business-centric publications spreading FUD about it though.

This article suggests it was connected to lower business rents: https://anderson-review.ucla.edu/a-15-minimum-wage-may-have-...

(The mechanism being that restaurants pass on the cost of their higher wages to their landlords)

> the researchers present evidence that minimum wage changes led area restaurants to raise prices, change menu items, obtain lower rents in the high wage areas and, in some cases, caused eateries to shut down.

I wonder if the units made empty by closures may have reduced price pressure on the ones that survived.

Yes, maybe. There's a definite tension between:

* Restaurants being unwilling to raise prices (diners are notoriously intolerant, it can kill restaurants).

* Landlords being unwilling to lower rents.

* Restaurants being unwilling to tolerate < 6% profit margins.

* Landlords being unwilling to lose a good, paying tenant if there isnt another around the corner.

The pain has to be distributed somehow though.