Re:The Embarrassing Naked Photos On Your Stolen Laptop May N...
by hackerblues on Wednesday August 31, 2011 @12:28AM
(#2944319)
I didn't know how cheaply a laptop could be purchased for so I just checked on Ebay for Used/Refurbished laptops. Currently there are 47 'Buy It Now', nominally complete and working, laptops/netbooks available for $40-60.
They all looked pretty crappy, is it reasonable to assume they are all stolen property on the basis of their price alone?
Re:The Embarrassing Naked Photos On Your Stolen Laptop May N...
by tripzilch on Wednesday August 31, 2011 @08:00AM
(#2945169)
A good bunch of them, most certainly.
Re:The Embarrassing Naked Photos On Your Stolen Laptop May N...
by ajays on Wednesday August 31, 2011 @12:15AM
(#2944287)
It depends on the type of laptop. Today, a brand new laptop can be had for $350. If this was, say, a 4-year old model with a lot of wear and tear on the surface (possibly, since it was a laptop that was loaned to people), then it's possible that it appeared worth under $100.
Re:The Embarrassing Naked Photos On Your Stolen Laptop May N...
by ugh on Wednesday August 31, 2011 @02:48AM
(#2944595)
The article is not really clear about that, but it sounds like the laptop was broken and had to be fixed.
Given that it’s possible to buy new laptops for $300 it is certainly entirely possible that $60 are a reasonable price.
Re:The Embarrassing Naked Photos On Your Stolen Laptop May N...
by zik on Wednesday August 31, 2011 @01:23AM
(#2944442)
I think the point was that the laptop wasn't working when she bought it. She had to have it fixed.
Re:The Embarrassing Naked Photos On Your Stolen Laptop May N...
by nowarninglabel on Wednesday August 31, 2011 @04:26AM
(#2944783)
Take a look at page 3. She not only didn't but it until it was fixed but she also demanded the original agreement be kept on the price.
http://www.internetcases.com/library/cases/2011-08-22-clemen...
Uh, no she doesn't. Buying a working laptop for $60 is going to easily constitute knowing the laptop was being sold for less than true value. Sorry, I don't have the link, but this whole receiving stolen goods knowingly thing was explained fairly well on HN in some comments a couple months back.