Re:This shouldn't have happened: A vulnerability postmortem
by raverbashing on Thursday December 02, 2021 @02:33AM
(#29413484)
> Using a `std::vector<std::byte>`
And herein lies the problem. Your statement is correct. But that type definition is exactly why C++ feels like a 50's car retrofitted with an electric drivetrain and a DVD player on the dash
It will almost run like a modern thing but it will fail when it shouldn't.
And herein lies the problem. Your statement is correct. But that type definition is exactly why C++ feels like a 50's car retrofitted with an electric drivetrain and a DVD player on the dash
It will almost run like a modern thing but it will fail when it shouldn't.