I think you've outlined exactly the kind of contradiction that I think it is - a moral, not a legal one. The laws on the books encourage this sort of insane behaviour, and as a result, two people are dead, but legally speaking, nobody's at fault. I'm not blaming any of this on the jury.

Had the facts gone even a little differently, one person would have been dead, and again, it's unlikely that anyone would have been found at fault.