News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Facebook reverses Kyle Rittenhouse policy by esyir on Wednesday December 01, 2021 @10:55PM (#29412395)
Said dead people should also not have been there. But they didn't. They were there, he was there, but they made the even worse decision to attack him. At that point, self defense is justifiable.

Any argument that Rittenhouse should not have been there to begin with also similarly applies to the dead. That they instigated the incident is the reason we call it self defense, as compared to the irrelevant school shooter analogy.

Re:Facebook reverses Kyle Rittenhouse policy by jacquesm on Wednesday December 01, 2021 @11:00PM (#29412419)
I totally agree with that. But nobody in their right mind feels that defending a bunch of cars is worth human lives.
Re:Facebook reverses Kyle Rittenhouse policy by rayiner on Thursday December 02, 2021 @12:21AM (#29412820)
It’s not a “bunch of cars.” It’s the livelihoods of a couple of immigrants who did nothing to deserve having their business destroyed.

It’s not just some buildings. It’s people’s community. Their businesses, their places of recreation, their community gathering places. That built environment was the labor of many people who left more to their kids than they started with. Property is the difference between Bangladesh and America. Many of these communities never rebound after riots like this. Destroying city blocks like this is profoundly anti-social and damaging to the people who live there.

Re:Facebook reverses Kyle Rittenhouse policy by jacquesm on Thursday December 02, 2021 @01:12AM (#29413071)
Yes, you're right, death penalty right there!

The difference between Bangladesh and America is a bit more than just property, and the difference between either and some other places in the world is that they are both extremes.

Re:Facebook reverses Kyle Rittenhouse policy by joshuamorton on Thursday December 02, 2021 @03:48AM (#29413888)
Shooting people is also profoundly anti social and damaging to the people shot, but you don't seem to criticize Kyle much.
Re:Facebook reverses Kyle Rittenhouse policy by esyir on Thursday December 02, 2021 @01:29AM (#29413155)
They made that decision themselves.

This isn't a case where they attacked him and then he pulled out a pistol and shot them. This was open carry with a rifle. To answer the point you made, they made the decision to attack a clearly armed man and thus evaluated that attacking those cars was worth their own lives.

Re:Facebook reverses Kyle Rittenhouse policy by mannerheim on Thursday December 02, 2021 @01:26AM (#29413136)
They didn't lose their lives for destroying cars. They lost them for attacking Rittenhouse.
Re:Facebook reverses Kyle Rittenhouse policy by GhettoComputers on Wednesday December 01, 2021 @11:35PM (#29412605)
Property rights of any civilized country disagrees.