News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sarah's Non-Traditional Job Search Experiment by wccrawford on Tuesday August 30, 2011 @08:59AM (#2941207)
- somewhat

- yes

- No! I think they a precursor to contact for a reason. Why would I let her waste hours of time (mine, or other employees) without even having an idea if she's qualified or not?

- Possibly... But I thought the object of this exercise was to find a job, not to eliminate options.

For the record, I upvoted you... Mainly because the first one seems to be self-referential. ;)

Re:Sarah's Non-Traditional Job Search Experiment by urbanjunkie on Tuesday August 30, 2011 @10:35AM (#2941593)
Resumes and CVs are a crapshoot, and typically add little real value - for the most part they give you almost no idea whether the person is really qualified or not.

At this point, if I was hiring and in Boston (or wherever), I'd be tempted to shoot her an email asking her for reference sites, and then on looking at the sites, perhaps grabbing a quick coffee with her. Time taken (1 minute to 1 hour)

As for removing options, I think that's fine - she clearly doesn't want another development McJob, so having a filter (for her and you) is actually a time saver - I mean, you didn't even have to spend 5 minutes reading her resume (although you've probably lost way more time out of your busy schedule reading the comments on HN ;-) )