> There is a reason more civilized countries have decided that the state should have the monopoly on violence

There are only two kinds of individuals that argue someone shouldn't have the right to self defense or the right to keep and bear arms: A) someone naive to history and the purpose of that rifle on the labourer's cottage wall or B) someone attempting to argue in bad faith as they wish to disarm them to do evil to.

It's clear here based on your shown bias, wanting to paint certain political opponents as "violent", but then ignore the other side of the spectrum that caused this situation to develop, that was literally burning the town down, we can determine that you fall into group B here. Some of us watched our family trees get erased because individuals like yourself feel that only the authoritarians should have access to firearms throughout history, and some of us are not OK with that behavior.

Not happening, but you can try to come and take it.