Re:Wikipedia is loaded, so why’s it asking for donations?
by colejohnson66 on Wednesday December 01, 2021 @09:37AM
(#29403978)
If we're being fair, the deletion log mentions the exact reason: it wasn't an article that was deleted; it was a (cross-namespace) redirect. The actual article could've been some user's sandbox page or something. If a page is a sandbox (not complete), there shouldn't be redirects to it. When the page is complete enough, then it can be moved to the main namespace.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Wikipedia is loaded, so why’s it asking for donations?
by lastbitwritten on Wednesday December 01, 2021 @04:44PM
(#29409524)
So the fact that a well maintained page exists for one and not the other isn’t a bias?
Re:Wikipedia is loaded, so why’s it asking for donations?
by colejohnson66 on Wednesday December 01, 2021 @05:46PM
(#29410158)
Yes and no. It’s just that no one has bothered to make the page for one; you’re free to do so. Your accusation of deletion implies that there was a page that was deleted. That would be a bias, but it wasn’t the case. The page was a redirect that violated the rules.
In other words, there’s a bias in the editors to not make it, but there’s no malicious bias that deleting an actual article would imply.
Re:Wikipedia is loaded, so why’s it asking for donations?
by lastbitwritten on Thursday December 02, 2021 @12:31AM
(#29412864)
But look a little closer…
Someone first moved it to userspace, causing it to become a redirect: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_left...
Which then triggered it’s deletion.
Re:Wikipedia is loaded, so why’s it asking for donations?
by colejohnson66 on Thursday December 02, 2021 @09:46AM
(#29416755)
Ah. That is interesting. The reason for the deletion of the draft is supposedly inactivity. I can't see the contents of the page before deletion, so I can't comment on how complete the draft was, but it's definitely a page that should exist.