Yes, I know the circumstances are different, but I do think it's ironic.
or it was just the typical double speak from Jobs until they were able to launch their walled garden. Anyone else remember when iPhone users were told they were holding the iPhone wrong during Antennagate? [0]
[0] https://www.engadget.com/2010-06-24-apple-responds-over-ipho...
>the effect is that innovation is stifled.
There's no such thing as PWA. There are several dozen of standards, and any combination of them is called PWAs by various people. And quite a few of those combinations work perfectly fine on Apple devices.
What's worse is that too many of those standards are extremely badly designed (service workers) or are pure Chrome-only "standards" rammed through standards bodies (Bluetooth, HID etc.).
They just don't get their cut from it, so, not a priority.
--- start quote ---
Talking about mobile phones and tablets, a Progressive Web App is installable with offline capabilities using the following browsers and app stores:
- iOS and iPadOS
Safari (since iOS 11.3), AppStore (since iOS/iPadOS 14, with some limitations), Mobile Configuration for enterprise distribution.
--- end quote ---
Sounds like you're setting a double standard when Apple also runs ads on their devices[0] as well as selling their user's private data[1]
[0] https://stevestreza.com/2020/02/17/ios-adware/
[1] https://www.macrumors.com/2021/11/26/apple-italy-fine-user-d...
Anyone who claims those are equivalent to what is going on on the web is being dishonest.
Neither of the articles even claims that Apple was “selling user data”, so that’s a straight up lie.
I can’t help you if you are going to post links that don’t say what you claim they are saying.
Why did Spotify and Pax Labs make PWAs again?
Whether they do have ulterior motives or not, the effect is that innovation is stifled.