News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Proof of stake is incapable of producing a consensus by tomp on Sunday November 28, 2021 @12:31PM (#29370846)
This article is complete FUD.

> of which the following sources are considered to be renewable

in other words, it attempts to define the world "renewable" along favoured political ideologies.

From Wikipedia:

> Advances in breeder reactor technology could allow the current reserves of uranium to provide power for humanity for billions of years, thus making nuclear power a sustainable energy

TL;DR: nuclear is just as renewable as solar (beyond any likely duration of the human civilisation).

Re:Proof of stake is incapable of producing a consensus by arcticbull on Sunday November 28, 2021 @07:32PM (#29374892)
I saw the renewability as more of a thought exercise, because I agree with you, there's more than enough nuclear feedstock to keep us going indefinitely.