News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Proof of stake is incapable of producing a consensus by lukifer on Sunday November 28, 2021 @12:30PM (#29370832)
The focus on fixed money supply seems a little absurd to me anyway, given the triviality of creating new crypto-currencies, and the relatively low transaction costs of trading between them.

Imagine making a case for returning to the gold standard, when thousands of other choices for new precious metals, all with the same performance characteristics, were literally just lying around, and a network of drones would let you swap perfectly and instantly between those metals for pennies!

In that light, one can certainly understand the fervent contempt that Bitcoin maximalists hold for "shitcoins"; but a free-banking market cuts both ways. Barring a state blessing one chain and outlawing the rest, creating new cryptos and swapping between them won't go away. The proper way to measure the emergent "monetary policy" of crypto-currency is of the sum of all chains, not of Bitcoin itself.

Re:Proof of stake is incapable of producing a consensus by littlestymaar on Sunday November 28, 2021 @03:56PM (#29372928)
Indeed. And I personally love to remind the fans of bitcoin's limited supply that with the different forks the bitcoin faced during its life, the bitcoin money supply grew a lot more than it was supposed to, without causing any price collapse.
Re:Proof of stake is incapable of producing a consensus by danlugo92 on Sunday November 28, 2021 @07:06PM (#29374699)
Bitcoin is safe and decentralized, all of the other coins are not.