Hmm, I disagree it’s not being debated here. There’s certainly a lot of healthy debate. It just happens to be centered far more towards the “principle of boosting the disadvantaged” (so our concern over the immuno-compromised, the infirm and weak, the underprivileged, etc), whereas the debate elsewhere kind of sidelines them, or at least puts the concerns of healthy privileged people at the same level.

Not sure my point is getting across. I’m not quite sure what my point is. Still trying to figure out what makes California (and especially San Francisco) different without resorting to simple left vs right language.