TSMC “Apple-first” 3nm policy leads to AMD and Qualcomm mutiny

Re:TSMC “Apple-first” 3nm policy leads to AMD and Qualcomm m... by kuschku on Thursday November 25, 2021 @11:30AM (#29342645)

The meaning of legal terms are decided by courts for their jurisdiction.

When I, as european, wrote monopolistic, then that definition can still hold, as the European definition of that term is not decided by US courts.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:TSMC “Apple-first” 3nm policy leads to AMD and Qualcomm m... by zepto on Thursday November 25, 2021 @01:58PM (#29343928)

Are you the person I was replying to?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:TSMC “Apple-first” 3nm policy leads to AMD and Qualcomm m... by kuschku on Thursday November 25, 2021 @05:36PM (#29345622)

I started the comment chain with my comment to which you replied "Apple has never had a monopoly on anything"

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:TSMC “Apple-first” 3nm policy leads to AMD and Qualcomm m... by zepto on Friday November 26, 2021 @09:45AM (#29350621)

Have you looked into their profit margins? Do you still claim they are 90%+?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:TSMC “Apple-first” 3nm policy leads to AMD and Qualcomm m... by kuschku on Saturday November 27, 2021 @12:27PM (#29361756)

For the store? Most definitely, considering I can see what costs I expense for self-hosting all the infrastructure I need, developing the software, etc compared to what they want for it. That’s almost 2 orders of magnitude difference.

[ Parent | on HN ]