Re:TSMC “Apple-first” 3nm policy leads to AMD and Qualcomm m...
by zepto on Thursday November 25, 2021 @02:06PM
(#29344004)
Everyone has a monopoly on their own products. Samsung has a monopoly on Galaxy phones. Tesla has a monopoly on Model Ss. It’s meaningless to say that Apple has a monopoly on a certain part of the iPhone infrastructure, since it’s their product.
Of course they don’t have a monopoly on mobile apps or app stores or phones. There are competing products.
Re:TSMC “Apple-first” 3nm policy leads to AMD and Qualcomm m...
by melff on Thursday November 25, 2021 @04:02PM
(#29344960)
You're conflating the phones themselves with the secondary markets they create.
The problem is that Apple has a monopoly in selling/distributing Apps to iphone users. This is not the case on other operating systems, technically not even on android(eg. Samsung) and has nothing to do with a "monopoly on their own products".
Re:TSMC “Apple-first” 3nm policy leads to AMD and Qualcomm m...
by shukantpal on Thursday November 25, 2021 @08:29PM
(#29346724)
You're calling a product (iOS app platform) a secondary market.
TL;DR iphones don't have a monopoly, the _AppStore_ has.
On Andoird the situation is a bit murkier, you technically can install software from outside Google's playstore, but you have to click trough scary dialogs(warnings about the danger of doing so), and App Stores installed that way don't have the same device permissions than googles play store have(you have to manually confirm each software update, for example). so yeah, on android it's debatable, but that's a story for another time.