The sticky issue of consent in street photography

Re:The sticky issue of consent in street photography by Edman274 on Wednesday November 24, 2021 @11:16PM (#29338175)

This is a bad faith reply. Non-existent hypothetical devices are not worth considering when talking about the morality of something that someone does today.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The sticky issue of consent in street photography by shard on Monday November 29, 2021 @05:59PM (#29386453)

I saw this a while ago, Argus II implant: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05ee61Bu-Ok

It exists, albeit only B&W and at a very low resolution. However as we all know, technology can advance very quickly, and high resolution cameras are not inconceivable for this application.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The sticky issue of consent in street photography by dheera on Thursday November 25, 2021 @03:06AM (#29339257)

I choose to frame my view of morality in terms of technological developments that are likely to happen in the next 100 years (approximately a human lifetime for anyone born today), not what exists today. Today is antiquated as soon as something is invented something tomorrow.

"Hypothetical" is an assumption. You don't know what I have, and what I'm experimenting with.

[ Parent | on HN ]