Protect IP threatens the future of DNS security

Posted by nextparadigms on Sunday August 28, 2011 @06:49AM
from the afterdawn.com dept.

( 9 comments | 42 points | on HN )

Re:Protect IP threatens the future of DNS security by Hyena on Sunday August 28, 2011 @08:22AM (#2933818)

Another step in America's quest to become its parody of China.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Protect IP threatens the future of DNS security by tmcb on Sunday August 28, 2011 @10:20AM (#2933961)

And, yet bizarre, some people will see that as a necessary evil.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Protect IP threatens the future of DNS security by biturd on Sunday August 28, 2011 @01:23PM (#2934390)

There probably is a protect the kids clause in there, so if you go against it, you are for CP.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Protect IP threatens the future of DNS security by Hyena on Sunday August 28, 2011 @11:04AM (#2934039)

Speak to enough mainlanders and you'll see the same opinion in China.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Protect IP threatens the future of DNS security by JoshTriplett on Sunday August 28, 2011 @01:46PM (#2934464)

And sadly, in both cases they have little control over it.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Protect IP threatens the future of DNS security by sp332 on Sunday August 28, 2011 @10:31AM (#2933978)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Protect IP threatens the future of DNS security by lookforipv6 on Sunday August 28, 2011 @09:21PM (#2935522)

This idea of PROTECT IP is really bad. As Vixie said, it will bring more trouble than solutions. And in the end, it won't solve anything.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Protect IP threatens the future of DNS security by dvdhsu on Sunday August 28, 2011 @02:36PM (#2934594)

Can't you just use an off-shore DNS?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Protect IP threatens the future of DNS security by lookforipv6 on Sunday August 28, 2011 @09:20PM (#2935519)

.com, .net, .org are managed by US companies. So, no matter where you have the DNSs

[ Parent | on HN ]