Money isn't capital. Money represents capital. When they try to spend that windall money, in aggregate, it will cause inflation, and the money will be proven to represent less capital than previously assumed. The seller will thrive, but non-sellers will suffer higher prices.

My point is that one industry isn't starved because an allocator buys assets in a given asset class such as real estate. The money doesn't disappear, it keeps moving.

you mean to tell me this is some kind of economy?

Income = expenditure is one of the most intuitive but least grasped concepts of introductory economics. It's interesting to me that this is the case.