Re:The Further Text Adventures of Scott Adams
by Zababa on Wednesday November 24, 2021 @01:36PM
(#29333463)
I don't think it validates what you're saying. You're saying it's creepy, while the study says it's natural if the goal is not a long term commitments. Or is your view that anything that's not a long term commitment is creepy?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Further Text Adventures of Scott Adams
by monocasa on Wednesday November 24, 2021 @01:45PM
(#29333574)
A) We're discussing a marriage
B) If you read the study and not just the abstract, it puts the general lowest age for 60yo men at around 45 for purely sexual fantasy partners. A 25yo is wayyyyy outside that bounds.
Re:The Further Text Adventures of Scott Adams
by Zababa on Wednesday November 24, 2021 @01:58PM
(#29333721)
> If you read the study and not just the abstract
I'd have to purchase the PDF for that.
> it puts the general lowest age for 60yo men at around 45 for purely sexual fantasy partners
I find it really really high and hard to believe. I'm not sure about the methodology employed, but if people can just lie, I wouldn't trust the results of that study.