News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Further Text Adventures of Scott Adams by ModernMech on Wednesday November 24, 2021 @10:46AM (#29331102)
He’s an extremely wealthy divorcé in his mid 60s. She’s a 33 year old model… which is well past the top end of that career, with two children, who is now the VP of Adams’ WhenHub. I think it’s clear everyone in that relationship knows what they are doing. Doesn’t make it any less the fact that he’s old enough to be her father.
Re:The Further Text Adventures of Scott Adams by Veen on Wednesday November 24, 2021 @11:03AM (#29331334)
Is this a American cultural quirk I'm not understanding? Who cares that he's old enough to be her father? Why is it interesting or relevant? He married an attractive younger woman. She married a rich older man. It happens every day all over the world. Its not the first marriage for either of them and they both already have children. It says very little about either person involved except that one likes attractive women and the other likes rich men with a sense of humor (if we assume the most cynical motivations).
Re:The Further Text Adventures of Scott Adams by time_to_smile on Wednesday November 24, 2021 @12:05PM (#29332254)
> Is this a American cultural quirk I'm not understanding?

As an American I would say: yes, it is.

I suspect it has something to do with the rising neoteny of more recent generations coupled with America's persistent puritanical views on sex, but there has been an increasingly bizarre fixation on the age gap of couples. All teenagers have recently be re-defined as children, so much that it's common on places like reddit to view even attraction to say a 17 year old viewed as a form of pedophilia.

For nearly all of human history men over 30 forming relationships with women in their late teens has been normal. This was even not too rare 30 or so years ago in the US. But there has been a rising moral panic about age and sex that leads to comments like the above.

Re:The Further Text Adventures of Scott Adams by monocasa on Wednesday November 24, 2021 @01:46PM (#29333581)
So wait, it's simultaneously a Puritanical hang up from the past, and also contrary to the way things have always been?
Re:The Further Text Adventures of Scott Adams by inkblotuniverse on Wednesday November 24, 2021 @03:02PM (#29334446)
Maybe America's puritany is just conserved. As its ire shifts away from some thing as they become liberalised/destigmatised, it shifts onto others.
Re:The Further Text Adventures of Scott Adams by stickfigure on Wednesday November 24, 2021 @11:07AM (#29331380)
> Doesn’t make it any less the fact that he’s old enough to be her father.

Honest question: So what? Why does that trouble you?

I would understand if one side was indeed "extremely" young, but 60s/30s are unquestionably adults, and there don't seem to be any consent issues.

Re:The Further Text Adventures of Scott Adams by ModernMech on Wednesday November 24, 2021 @11:32AM (#29331755)
It doesn’t trouble me personally, I stated the facts of the matter and that my interpretation of it is that everyone is getting what they want. Others here have stated it weirds them out and that’s fine too. It’s well known in our society that this kind of age gap can be problematic for some. We have little “rules” about it (https://xkcd.com/314/), which are just societal norms. Scott Adam falls out of this norm and it makes people uncomfortable, as norm-breaking tends to do. One question people might ask is, why don’t you date someone your own age? There are a lot of reasons one could answer, but when one says something like “I don’t talk about where we met. People make judgments”, and they are already breaking norms, then I think it’s fine some people have reservations. Not that those reservations mean anything to anyone, but it’s not an unreasonable feeling to have when confronted with such an unconventional relationship.