News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Don't bring a tree to a mesh fight by runnerup on Tuesday November 23, 2021 @08:08PM (#29325819)
I think there's a typo:

> It is in the shape of a Directed Acyclic Rooted Tree or simply a tree. The neat thing is, a tree-shaped computation is always "one-pass". Each node can only be passed at least once.

Should be:

> Each node can only be passed at most once.

Re:Don't bring a tree to a mesh fight by valand on Tuesday November 23, 2021 @11:08PM (#29326844)
Author here. Thank you for catching that (and taking time to read)! Fixing it up tonight.
Re:Don't bring a tree to a mesh fight by karolkozub on Wednesday November 24, 2021 @07:22AM (#29329268)
I think I found one more minor typo – in the Control Flow Graph section I believe "The possible number of calls to c is zero to infinity;" should be "zero to one" instead, as the flow terminates as soon as it reaches "c", so there is no chance for it to be greater than one.
Re:Don't bring a tree to a mesh fight by valand on Wednesday November 24, 2021 @08:31AM (#29329786)
Thanks. Great catch!

One thing to learn from this, working past 6pm will most likely yield bugs rather than values.

Re:Don't bring a tree to a mesh fight by runnerup on Tuesday November 23, 2021 @11:43PM (#29326992)
No, thank you. I thoroughly enjoyed the article. I also enjoy the title, although it caused some cognitive dissonance by implying that the primary thesis would be: to be careful trying to use trees, where meshes are more appropriate.

Instead the concluding thesis was: "Whenever Possible, Make a Tree" and due to my expectations I thought for a second that I may have accidentally skipped over some section which championed meshes.

Potentially, putting the thesis as a single sentence near the top would prime readers so they can accurately ingest the rest of the article with proper prejudice.

Re:Don't bring a tree to a mesh fight by valand on Wednesday November 24, 2021 @08:39AM (#29329848)
"Whenever Possible, Make a Tree" I've thought about it, but I added " and the Other Way Around" instead, just because I feel the original title gets more glances than the alternatives.