Re:Winamp
by kgwxd on Tuesday November 23, 2021 @01:55AM
(#29315243)
VLC users beg to differ. Once Winamp was sold to AOL, the name was dead, I'm surprised anyone was willing to pay money for it after that.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Winamp
by huhtenberg on Tuesday November 23, 2021 @02:51AM
(#29315552)
Why would one pay any money when 2.95 still works perfectly?
If its proprietary there's probably bugs in the binaries (even DLLs) which can be exploited. But IIRC Winamp was FOSS'ed at some point.
I meant pay for the name. Did other owners of the name actually try to make it a paid-for product? Now that I think about it, was the original free?