News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Science upside for Starship by apeace on Monday November 22, 2021 @12:01PM (#29308639)
I don't know anything about this, but I was surprised to read about the light sails proposal for heating Mars.

> Mere dozens of such Starship launches would be needed to substantially increase net insolation on Mars and begin raising the temperature, without the emplacement of any surface infrastructure.

Heating sounds like a good step, but aren't the major challenges a lack of atmosphere and magnetosphere? Having one without the others seems a bit useless to me. What am I missing?

Re:Science upside for Starship by mrfusion on Monday November 22, 2021 @01:21PM (#29309812)
Heat should help add atmosphere to some degree. Solid co2 could gasify and some frozen water could enter the atmosphere.
Re:Science upside for Starship by wongarsu on Monday November 22, 2021 @02:58PM (#29310931)
If you can heat the planet up, you can start redirecting comets or asteroids rich in water ice and frozen CO2 into it to get a thicker atmosphere.
Re:Science upside for Starship by cnlevy on Monday November 22, 2021 @04:35PM (#29311824)
I'm looking for the day where 1000 Starships pull a million ton ice asteroid into Mars in order to thicken its atmosphere.
Re:Science upside for Starship by Valgrim on Tuesday November 23, 2021 @07:03AM (#29316850)
A million tons of ice would add more or less the water content of a medium-small fishing pond on the whole planet (or a cube with 100 meter sides).

The order of magnitude of would require stripping Ceres of it's mantle.