> At any rate, copyright licenses cannot be enforced with smart contracts
Wasn't claimed either. Why do people keep inventing claims to then criticize them? (I'm not even into NFTs, don't own any and don't plan to, but a lot of the reaction is just bizarre. No, they don't magically enforce copyright. No, they also aren't supposed to.)
Is it recognized by the law? Can people sue those who fail to comply with it?
You can do all the circular reasoning you want but at the end of the day everything is backed by violence and coercitive power.
That's why nations have army/navy , to make other countries know that what they say carries weight because they can back it up with bullets and bombs, not just words.
You can't.
Besides, NFT enthusiasts have the illusion that the graphic art market is big. It's not.
Just think about how many people you know that have a painting in their home. And no, the IKEA type paintings do not count. I mean a genuine painting.
Yep, same as any other licensed thing. Because copyright law is still just copyright law. NFTs don't magically add universal enforcement, and aren't supposed to.
> NFT enthusiasts have the illusion that the graphic art market is big. It's not.
Yes, there is a lot of crazy hype and over-expectations around, and sadly getting most of the attention.
In the US, anyway, doing that would not be a copyright violation.