Re:A Xiaomi phone might’ve shipped with a censorship list in...
by sol_invictus on Friday November 19, 2021 @05:57AM
(#29275947)
H&M was not a "consumer-led boycott" - it was an effort by the owners of the digital infrastructure (major ecommerce platforms in this case) to actively hide the existence of H&M stores in China.
The US vs China argument is detrimental in any case. The discussion should evolve into achieving digital sovereignity as a whole, not argue about whether player x or y in the current rotten system is better.
This will most certainly not be solved on an EU level. The only outcome that they could produce would be replacing US & China with EU-controlled narrative and again, it's just repeating the same problem, albeit in lesser severity.
Re:A Xiaomi phone might’ve shipped with a censorship list in...
by LargoLasskhyfv on Saturday November 20, 2021 @02:06AM
(#29286168)
[2] is right.
It's just that we (mostly) don't know it any different (anymore).
And probably lost the ability to do it different. At least for now. May change. Slowly.
But any time I'm reading something about Industry 4.0, Smart City, Internet of things, I have to supress a hysterical laughing fit :-)
> Did we not see this already with H&M stores in China? I can't believe there are still (smart) people here on HN who pretend like there's no danger involved.
That comparison doesn't really hit the mark: A consumer-led boycott within China, dubious as the reasons may be, is in no way an attack on our sovereignty. Apart from pretty wack but minor diplomatic incidents, there hasn't really been much actual damage done by China towards the EU. I agree with you that 5G infrastructure should probably fall in large parts under any strategic autonomy policy, but buying Xiaomi phones seems pretty inconsequential.
[1] https://ecfr.eu/special/independence_play_europes_pursuit_of...
[2] https://sur.conectas.org/en/digital-sovereignty-or-digital-c...