News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Impossible food sues to cancel earlier trademark owners. Parent comment

Re:Impossible food sues to cancel earlier trademark owners by will4274 on Wednesday November 17, 2021 @07:19PM (#29260677)
It still doesn't follow. It's wrong to kill because of the harm killing causes. Whether the killing is done my an immoral or amoral agent doesn't change the effect. If you really believe dead rabbits is a bad result, you ought be spending your time preventing the amoral agents from causing that bad result.

Consider an infant - an infant is basically an amoral agent - it doesn't understand killing. If a infant kills somebody with a gun, we don't say "oh well, he doesn't understand killing" - we say "why the heck did that baby have a gun? Where are his parents?" We expect moral agents to prevent amoral agents from causing harm. So why aren't you trying to prevent the foxes from killing the rabbits?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Impossible food sues to cancel earlier trademark owners by delecti on Thursday November 18, 2021 @08:50AM (#29265302)
Am I obligated to personally intervene in every bad thing that happens in the world as a prerequisite for pointing out they're bad? Your argument seems to boil down to "you aren't trying to stop all instances of a category of bad thing, so your opposition to that category of bad thing is invalid", which is a pretty weird argument. I also think murder is wrong, but aside from personally not murdering, I don't do anything about murders happening in the world.
[ Parent | on HN ]