News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Databricks response to Snowflake's accusation of lacking ... by ignoramous on Monday November 15, 2021 @04:44PM (#29233190)
> I think the reason why Snowflake is so nervous because they know they can’t win this game.

Isn't Databricks' delta.io, which their Data Lakehouse product builds on top of, open source? Snowflake could take the best parts from and run with it?

Re:Databricks response to Snowflake's accusation of lacking ... by bpaneural on Monday November 15, 2021 @04:59PM (#29233375)
They could in principle. GCP, for instance, does do that. So does HP. And Databricks don't mind that as they have a strong open source legacy. But that takes away the proprietary lock-in strategy of Snowflake.
Re:Databricks response to Snowflake's accusation of lacking ... by buttaphingas on Monday November 15, 2021 @11:27PM (#29236845)
Delta is open source, but Databricks keeps optimizations for themselves as proprietary. I'm not sure why it would be any better than Snowflake's solution, which is automatically deployed across multiple AZs as a fully HA system and gives full ACID transaction compliance across any number of tables (not just per-table).
Re:Databricks response to Snowflake's accusation of lacking ... by bpaneural on Wednesday November 17, 2021 @02:14AM (#29250036)
Essentially with Databricks making Delta open source, you can move away from Databricks to EMR or Presto (with their own optimizations) without incurring a data tax. You're also able to move between cloud providers at ease as data sits in low cost buckets.