> Is Syncthing my ideal backup application?
> No. Syncthing is not a great backup application because all changes to your files (modifications, deletions, etc.) will be propagated to all your devices. You can enable versioning, but we encourage you to use other tools to keep your data safe from your (or our) mistakes.
I'm really not super familiar with Syncthing, but it sounds like it's niche is availability as opposed to durability.
Anyone taking backups seriously already knows the 3-2-1 rule anyway.
This is the curse of sharp tools. Don't run unix if you don't want rm to rm.
I still also have backups, and zfs snapshots on a different independent machine.
I'll have two of the same RPi servers in different locations with all software running (like a hot swap) with Syncthing keeping them in sync while ZFS snapshots keeps a history. I can plug in a cold storage drive in the second dock slot once in a while too. I'll have a spare RPi4b on the shelf in case it dies. If my server dies I can take the off site hot backup home and reconfig the network and then it is my primary server. With remote duplicacy backup I'm days away from getting going again. So ZFS snapshots + Syncthing and cold storage is where I'm going (for home use). Also I want to stick with Linux because I set up Freenas 5 years ago and now I forget how to admin it so I'd rather just keep with ZFS and Linux (the zfs send from freenas to zfs recv on Linux works perfectly).
That said, I keep ~/Documents and ~/dev these days in Syncthing directories, and one of my syncthing nodes is an Ubuntu LTS server with zfs, with the zfs-auto-snapshot package installed.
I still run my old backup system periodically (once or twice a month) but I now think Syncthing is at a point of reliability where realtime cross-machine sync is now my primary safety net wrt "the machine in front of me has turned to entropy", versus some point-in-time backup.