And always use "-fwrapv -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks". Those are source of the hardest to reason about UB and the small performance benefit is not worth the risk. I would love to always be certain I haven't accidentally hit UB, but that's equal to the halting problem, so for peace of mind, I just ask the compiler for a slightly safer variant of the language.
P.S. and old code definitely needs them, as at the time compilers didn't optimize so aggressively and lots of code does weird stuff with memory, shifts, etc.
Re:Why Lisp?
by throwawayapples on Friday November 12, 2021 @08:08PM
(#29206383)
Have a look at Apache 1 (C) or KDE 1 (C++); it'd be interesting to see what you think of those codebases, and they can certainly predate 2001.
Use some of the -W* flags (-Wall -Wpedantic -Wconversion, ...) and specify the standard -std=c90.
Avoid undefined behaviors:
- https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/language/behavior
- https://wiki.sei.cmu.edu/confluence/display/c
(Also use cppcheck, valgrind, gdb, astyle, make, ...)
Done.
Fun fact: JS and C are both standardized by ISO.