News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How trains could replace planes in Europe by gremloni on Thursday November 11, 2021 @11:30PM (#29196315)
Why would I want to spend 12 hours on something I can do in 1 hour for less money. Trains are a regression unless it is freight.
Re:How trains could replace planes in Europe by danny_codes on Friday November 12, 2021 @02:46AM (#29197167)
A high-speed train is about 40% the speed of an airplane.

So a 1 hour flight is comparable to a 2.5 hour train ride. However a quick check shows that, on average, it takes over 2 hours (133 minutes) to get on the plane after you've arrived at the airport. Then of course you've got to get off the plane, but we'll be generous and not count that time.

In summary, taking the train is about 30 minutes faster than flying. As for cost, well, the emissions from flying make the cost somewhat irrelevant. Any reasonable government would tax flying so it's more expensive than rail travel.

Re:How trains could replace planes in Europe by nicbou on Friday November 12, 2021 @04:10AM (#29197497)
That's a really slow train.

The benefit of trains (for what would be a 1 hour flight) is that you don't need to get to a distant airport and go through the usual airport nonsense. You just arrive 5 minutes early and board the train. You get off the same way, at the central terminal of a large city.