Haskell IHP framework, from a technical and business perspective

Re:Haskell IHP framework, from a technical and business pers... by lngnmn2 on Thursday November 11, 2021 @11:07AM (#29189476)

It is useless to say, but Haskell is a modeling and domain language, it is a sunset of math and highly sugared logic.

The proper place if Haskell code is Fastcgi and batch processing.

It should FFI everything infrastructure related and should be called by nginx or whatever.

Using it as a Java EE with monads is plain, well, let's say "over-engineering".

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Haskell IHP framework, from a technical and business pers... by chowells on Thursday November 11, 2021 @12:38PM (#29190679)

You have never used Haskell, have you?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Haskell IHP framework, from a technical and business pers... by icrbow on Friday November 12, 2021 @03:11AM (#29197264)

Why bother with nginx or whatever if its native server is http3-capable and performant enough by itself?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Haskell IHP framework, from a technical and business pers... by lngnmn2 on Friday November 12, 2021 @08:35PM (#29206512)

Because I don't see the point of having everything implemented in the same language, in sort of monolith with lots of complex dependencies.

For me, it is the same as to have a server in Mathlab.

Also, like I said, the code I am unreadable J2EE like mess of useless, redundant abstractions.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Haskell IHP framework, from a technical and business pers... by thewakalix on Thursday November 11, 2021 @01:40PM (#29191389)

If it's useless to say, why did you say it?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Haskell IHP framework, from a technical and business pers... by lngnmn2 on Friday November 12, 2021 @08:27PM (#29206479)

You see where this comment ended up? That is why.

[ Parent | on HN ]