Re:Microsoft Benchmarks Upcoming AMD Milan-X CPU
by judge2020 on Thursday November 11, 2021 @11:55AM
(#29190163)
> But perhaps not more directly, as with Boot Camp?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/dwightsilverman/2021/04/14/you-...
Obviously you have to run ARM Windows, but it’s indeed Windows.
Re:Microsoft Benchmarks Upcoming AMD Milan-X CPU
by neogodless on Thursday November 11, 2021 @12:07PM
(#29190313)
If I understand this article correctly, as of April 2021, you can run Windows on ARM under Parallels virtualization software, which is a Virtual Machine, or VM. So that's not direct to hardware, which I thought Boot Camp was?
Re:Microsoft Benchmarks Upcoming AMD Milan-X CPU
by my123 on Friday November 12, 2021 @06:08AM
(#29198103)
Boot Camp is direct on hardware indeed. VMs cover a significant proportion of the gap however.
It truly would not make any difference if Microsoft "supported" the M1 CPU, as Apple does not sell it to anyone without the rest of Apple computer attached to it. I mean, you can run Windows VMs on M1 computers now, with something like Parallels. But perhaps not more directly, as with Boot Camp?
> I would like to see how AMD and Intel can do to change this performance game
What are you trying to say here? In what way is AMD not "winning" the 64+ core CPU performance game?