News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:We saved millions in SSD costs by upgrading our filesystem by r3trohack3r on Tuesday November 09, 2021 @02:13PM (#29166055)
What you're calling "vendor lock-ins" I'm calling "providing sufficient value to justify cost."

It's not that migrating out isn't possible, it's that Amazon is providing "Engineering/SiteOps Departments as a Service" at a price that's hard to compete with in house.

Re:We saved millions in SSD costs by upgrading our filesystem by hackerfromthefu on Tuesday November 09, 2021 @02:58PM (#29166675)
What's the newspeak for the high egress fees?
Re:We saved millions in SSD costs by upgrading our filesystem by r3trohack3r on Wednesday November 10, 2021 @03:14PM (#29180036)
I'm not sure that's what I was arguing against.

From the GP's post - I was trying to say I read this as "the collection of services AWS provides would require several in-house engineering teams to compete with" not "vendor lock-in".

A single service is relatively easy to replicate if it is core to your business, but an entire on-demand datacenter w/ abstractions like Time Series databases, pub/sub services, etc. isn't as trivial to do yourself. Many of these services require teams of engineers to manage at scale, and engineers that _understand_ them well.

The on-demand service catalog of the cloud provides significant value. It's more than "pub/sub" or "blob storage" as a service. It's an entire engineering organization and data center as a service w/ pre-built architectures for you to start using today.

Re:We saved millions in SSD costs by upgrading our filesystem by whydoyoucare on Tuesday November 09, 2021 @03:59PM (#29167403)
I am not sure the size of your company and the budget for in-house prices, but we realized AWS is not just a lock-in, but also a permanent money drain.