NFT's aren't the answer to the problems of digital art

Re:NFT's aren't the answer to the problems of digital art by wccrawford on Tuesday November 09, 2021 @08:40AM (#29161570)

Except that, so far as I know, there's nothing stopping someone else from putting the exact same data in another block in the chain, and claiming that is "first" instead. And unless you already know the first copy exists, there's no way to find it via the blockchain itself, and so no way to prove "first" without already knowing it's the first.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:NFT's aren't the answer to the problems of digital art by brutusborn on Wednesday November 10, 2021 @10:17AM (#29175487)

I only have a fairly basic understanding of crypto, so this may be a very naive view, but I thought it was the same as bitcoin, whereby the whole network eventually comes to a consensus on the order of transactions / blocks on the chain?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:NFT's aren't the answer to the problems of digital art by wccrawford on Thursday November 11, 2021 @06:35AM (#29186875)

Sure, but if I post data to the blockchain (perhaps a URL to an XKCD comic) and someone else posts that exact same data another time, how would we even know each other posted it? At some point, it's practically impossible to search the entire block chain.

Now suppose each of use are selling the 'first' post of that data. How does a buyer know that we're really the first?

And so I'm saying that even claiming 'first' is practically impossible via blockchain. Even if someone knew about both of the instances above and could arbitrate between them, there might be a third, older instance yet.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:NFT's aren't the answer to the problems of digital art by brutusborn on Sunday November 21, 2021 @11:06AM (#29297202)

Why is it impossible to search the block chain? Isn't this how bitcoin works: to accept a transaction, all transactions with the relevant accounts must be searched and summed to ensure there are enough funds?

[ Parent | on HN ]