Re:Supreme Court declines to hear challenge to secrecy of U....
by Talanes on Monday November 08, 2021 @02:11PM
(#29152997)
In the most polite way possible, what are you talking about? How does anything you've quoted have anything but a tenuous, situational connection to the FISC court?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Supreme Court declines to hear challenge to secrecy of U....
by throwawaylinux on Monday November 08, 2021 @07:28PM
(#29156195)
The Mueller report said they found no such evidence, and therefore it failed to consider the evidence put before the FISC court in the first place.
Do you deny that Trump colluded with Putin to hack the election? Or that there was strong evidence of him having done so?