News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Supreme Court declines to hear challenge to secrecy of U.S. surveillance court. Parent comment

Re:Supreme Court declines to hear challenge to secrecy of U.... by throwawaylinux on Sunday November 07, 2021 @11:06PM (#29146051)
They already knew the dossier was flimsy and had problematic provenance, didn't they? There seems like no way that could possibly have been the only evidence used to justify the warrants, or to keep a special council investigation running for 2 years, or have Adam Schiff as ranking member on the House Intelligence Committee clearly state that he had seen ample evidence that Trump colluded with Putin to hack the election. Surely there must be much stronger evidence out there. The simplest explanation says that Putin and Trump got to Mueller and Schiff and others to keep them quiet and prevent the evidence getting out. What's the alternative?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Supreme Court declines to hear challenge to secrecy of U.... by GauntletWizard on Sunday November 07, 2021 @11:47PM (#29146191)
The alternative is that Obama and Biden, or anyone in their bureaucracy, got to the FBI and convinced them to accept their crazy dossier.

This is entirely he said she said, without the records of the court in question - and even then would likely be he said she said.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Supreme Court declines to hear challenge to secrecy of U.... by throwawaylinux on Monday November 08, 2021 @02:29AM (#29146812)
A very far fetched conspiracy theory that would really have astounding implications for the entire system of government inthe country. What's more likely happened is Putin and/or Trump got to Mueller and Schiff and others to silence them and bury all the evidence.
[ Parent | on HN ]