News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Supreme Court declines to hear challenge to secrecy of U.S. surveillance court.

Re:Supreme Court declines to hear challenge to secrecy of U.... by JumpCrisscross on Sunday November 07, 2021 @08:02PM (#29145177)
Do FISC rulings set precedent? Or are they more administrative in function?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Supreme Court declines to hear challenge to secrecy of U.... by woodruffw on Sunday November 07, 2021 @08:39PM (#29145375)
I found a Yale Law Journal essay[1] that suggests that FISC ruling are at least partially precedential. But I'm not really sure how that works, given that case law systems like ours require all precedent to be public.

[1]: https://www.yalelawjournal.org/comment/stare-decisis-and-sec...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Supreme Court declines to hear challenge to secrecy of U.... by bb88 on Sunday November 07, 2021 @08:19PM (#29145270)
How would one know?
[ Parent | on HN ]