Don’t be spooky

Re:Don’t be spooky by bookface on Saturday November 06, 2021 @02:38PM (#29132691)

I don't take as much issue with this happening the other way around. It's a rare opportunity for the information asymmetry shoe to be on the other foot.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Don’t be spooky by mavelikara on Saturday November 06, 2021 @05:02PM (#29133772)

> I don't take as much issue with this happening the other way around.

That seems to imply that your opposition to a person not being spooked is not a moral one. Please tell us more about it.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Don’t be spooky by somnic on Sunday November 07, 2021 @01:24AM (#29137039)

A manager's anxieties over losing an employee are not equivalent to an employee's anxieties over losing their livelihood. So taking less issue with it is perfectly consistent with it being a moral position.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Don’t be spooky by 5e92cb50239222b on Sunday November 07, 2021 @02:27AM (#29137286)

Depends on which employee it is. If you ever worked in economically depressed regions, you'd know what I'm talking about right away.

[ Parent | on HN ]