News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Interview with Charlie Munger on Controversial UCSB Dorm by sudosysgen on Saturday November 06, 2021 @12:44PM (#29131710)
Yes, it's not a problem to have a higher surface area to volume ratio. You can make a not so tall building with a budget of 330 000$ per room, by putting common area in the center.

The issue is not the aspect ratio. The issue is that Charlie is obsessed with having every room connected to a common space which is the one with natural light. It would be trivial to have a slightly higher aspect ratio, maybe one or two more floors, and have the common areas in the center.

Re:Interview with Charlie Munger on Controversial UCSB Dorm by labcomputer on Saturday November 06, 2021 @02:09PM (#29132413)
> it's not a problem to have a higher surface area to volume ratio

Apparently the original article included only 1/8th of the building's floor plan. Another commenter linked me this floor plan: https://www.dezeen.com/2021/11/02/architect-resigns-grotesqu...

As you can see, the surface area problem even worse!

Each bedroom is 8x10 feet, but the building is only 87 * 4 by 200 * 2 feet. That's 1496 linear feet of exterior wall. That's only enough for 187 exterior rooms per floor, while the design calls for approximately 512 (8 rooms per suite * 8 suites per house * 8 housed per floor).

> It would be trivial to have a slightly higher aspect ratio, maybe one or two more floors

You'd need to add not just "one or two" more floors, but increase the residential part of the building from 9 floors to 24!. Even if you made very narrow (6 foot) rooms, it would still require 18 floors.

> You can make a not so tall building with a budget of 330 000$ per room

And they're paying over $1 million per bathroom! I consider this a fairly disingenuous comment because the article is clear that the building includes space for other things like convertible classrooms and rec areas.