News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:HashiCorp – S1 by remram on Thursday November 04, 2021 @11:44PM (#29115207)
Vagrant can use containers, making it also a wrapper around OCI-compatible runtimes. In addition, it also supports VirtualBox, Hyper-V, VMWare, bare metal, SSH targets, and various cloud providers.

The real conclusion from your logic would be: why would you go to Docker rather than just using Vagrant?

Re:HashiCorp – S1 by __jem on Friday November 05, 2021 @12:01AM (#29115300)
I wasn't aware that Vagrant has Podman integration! That's pretty cool.

My point was not to defend Docker, but to suggest that Docker is increasingly irrelevant to the broader ecosystem.

I wouldn't use Vagrant because I (like many people) always target an orchestrator and not hypervisor or bare metal.

Re:HashiCorp – S1 by handrous on Friday November 05, 2021 @11:45AM (#29120924)
> The real conclusion from your logic would be: why would you go to Docker rather than just using Vagrant?

I use Docker as a nigh-universal package repository and package manager, with a huge and up-to-date selection of packages. It gives me a consistent way to run daemons my software depends on, nearly everywhere, including pinning the version and ensuring they all use the same config. It's docker-hub, really, that provides most of the value I get from Docker on a day-to-day basis, and that's the part I'd miss. I know there are other ways to create images and run containers, but I almost never create—or even modify—them myself.