Re:Linux x86 program start up – How the heck do we get to ma...
by avsbst on Thursday November 04, 2021 @05:36PM
(#29112816)
Would refer to the guidelines [1] for this site:
> Be kind. Don't be snarky.
> Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive.
> Eschew flamebait. Avoid unrelated controversies and generic tangents.
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html#comments
Re:Linux x86 program start up – How the heck do we get to ma...
by kbelder on Thursday November 04, 2021 @11:47PM
(#29115221)
"Eschew flamebait. Avoid unrelated controversies and generic tangents."
Unfortunately, the articles HN links to don't have to follow those guidelines.
Re:Linux x86 program start up – How the heck do we get to ma...
by chrsig on Thursday November 04, 2021 @05:31PM
(#29112764)
oh no! anything but trying to make STEM more welcoming to the women!! How can we possibly read any of this!?
Re:Linux x86 program start up – How the heck do we get to ma...
by ryan93 on Thursday November 04, 2021 @07:16PM
(#29113621)
Quite the suggestion that an anodyne joke about "real men" is whats stopping women from programming. In fact many women would no doubt find the suggestion patronizing.
Re:Linux x86 program start up – How the heck do we get to ma...
by commandlinefan on Friday November 05, 2021 @09:25AM
(#29118852)
If that's his personal moral code, I don't have a problem with him substituting "programmers" for "men", but just do it and spare me the lecture. I consciously avoid referring to groups of women or mixed-genders as "guys", but I don't stop and point out to everybody that I did it whenever I do.
Just three paragraphs in.