News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: Who's not sucky to work for? by somerando7 on Wednesday November 03, 2021 @06:07PM (#29100990)
Agreed, liking it here so far. But you do have to make sure you get on an interesting team. I wouldn't want to be on a lot of different teams here.
Re:Ask HN: Who's not sucky to work for? by dack on Wednesday November 03, 2021 @08:47PM (#29102447)
Which ones wouldn't you want to be on? Or at least is there a pattern to them?
Re:Ask HN: Who's not sucky to work for? by somerando7 on Thursday November 04, 2021 @01:36AM (#29103891)
This is purely my preference, but anything customer facing would be a snoozefest for me.

Most L6+ that I've met in infra are incredibly sharp, and there's tons of interesting problems being solved in infra/core systems right now.

On top of this... the "move fast" motto really does ring true, compared to google, facebook speed is like riding a bike vs walking.

Re:Ask HN: Who's not sucky to work for? by loxias on Wednesday November 03, 2021 @09:49PM (#29102809)
Is it really true that once you pass the interview and orientation you get to choose the team you want to work on?
Re:Ask HN: Who's not sucky to work for? by fbanon12341 on Wednesday November 03, 2021 @10:02PM (#29102881)
For general role hires, this is true, although it's a subset of all teams - teams with high priority roles pitch to you, you choose a couple to try out tasks for a few days. They stack rank, you stack rank, matches are made.

Internal transfers after 1 year are pretty easy. I've seen people transfer earlier, if it's clear the fit between employee and team isn't there.

Re:Ask HN: Who's not sucky to work for? by JohnBooty on Wednesday November 03, 2021 @10:15PM (#29102971)

      if it's clear the fit between employee and 
      team isn't there. 
This is very interesting to me. How good is management at discerning between...

a: "employee 12345 has been here for one year and probably wasn't a good hire"

and...

b: "employee 12345 has been here for one year, and they were probably a good hire, but they're not a good fit for their current team so let's get them to a new one!"

???

On a human level, I'm a firm believer that (b) happens a looooot. Personally, I've been anywhere from a turd to a star depending on company culture and team fit, and it wasn't me that was changing.

But I am amazed there are organizations that manage to spot (b) and actually correct it rather than cutting a person loose or just pidgeonholing them as a low performer.

Re:Ask HN: Who's not sucky to work for? by brianwawok on Wednesday November 03, 2021 @11:02PM (#29103249)
Def seems hard to do. You could pass an A many times before ”proving” they aren’t going to fit in any team.
Re:Ask HN: Who's not sucky to work for? by fbanon12341 on Friday November 05, 2021 @01:40AM (#29115845)
One way to side step the issue - trust the hiring process. I haven't seen very many issues, but Meta seems to give people multiple chances, on multiple teams, under multiple managers, before doing a pip (or whatever the equivalent is).
Re:Ask HN: Who's not sucky to work for? by somerando7 on Thursday November 04, 2021 @01:32AM (#29103881)
Yes, if they have headcount, you should be good to go